RECOGNITION OF HUMAN IDENTITIES THROUGH ANIMALS IN SELECTIONS OF ELIZABETH BISHOP’S POEMS
Abstract
Animals or the animal world has been the source of inspiration for many English as well as American poets and thereby assisted in shaping their attitudes toward life. In fact, animals are used for different purposes in poetry. Some poets may use animals to represent power or strength, while others may see in them as outstanding marks for beauty and love. However, as individuals of the post war generation, modern poets’ outlook to animals is as distinctive as their attitude to any other issue in their poems. In other words, while the poets of the previous ages tackled the outer or physical shapes of the animals, modern poets manipulated animals for the analysis of the defects or the weaknesses of modern man.
The modern American poet Elizabeth Bishop (1911-1979), employs animals in her poetry for the recognition of human identities. This is due to the poet’s undergoing of certain unacceptable habits and bitter experiences as her struggling with asthma, alcoholism and lesbianism. Such acts made the poet shield away from believing the dominance of humans over animals and think about an absolute equality between them. However, the unbearable sufferings of modern man in the twentieth century may contribute in forming the poet’s attitudes which conform to some of the theories of the previous centuries that claim equality between man and animals.
This paper aims at examining Elizabeth Bishop’s depiction of animals and its purposes. Meanwhile it focuses on the aspects of similarity and difference between humans and animals. This is followed by an investigation of the modernists’ views, and the purpose of their manipulation of animals. It sheds light on certain occasions that the poet presents for recognizing human identities via animals. This is achieved through analyzing some poems in which modern man’s defects and miseries are portrayed.
Downloads
References
Ayala, F. J. (2010). The Difference of Being Human: Morality. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697. PNAS | May 11, 2010 | vol. 107 | suppl. 2 | 9015–9022.
Bishop, E. (1979). The Complete Poems: 1927-1979. New York: The Noon Day Press.
Bloom, H. (2002). Bloom’s Major Poets: Elizabeth Bishop. Chelsea: Chelsea House Publishers.
Burns, A. (2002). Thematic Guide to American Poetry. London: Greenwood Press.
Cucinella, C. (2010). Poetics of the Body. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Diehl, J. F. (1993). Elizabeth Bishop and Marianne Moore, the Psychodynamics of Creativity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Driscoll, K. (2014). Toward a Poetics of Animality: Hofmannsthal, Rilke, Pirandello, Kafka . Columbia University- Graduate School of Arts and Science (unpublished PH. D thesis).
Ellos, W. J. (1989). Ethical Similarities in Human and Animal Social Structure. Chicago: Loyola University of Chicago.
Essert, E. (2012). Representations of Animals in the Work of Five North American Poets. McGill University, Montreal- Department of English (unpublished PH. D thesis).
Foer , J. S. (2009). Eating Animals. New York: Little, Brown Company.
Haung, I. Sh. (2010). Landscapes, Animals and Human Beings: Elizabeth Bishop’s Poetry and Ecocentrism. http://benz.nchu.edu.tw/~intergrams/intergrams/102-111/102-111-huang.pdf
Kimmelman, B. (2005). 20th Century American Poetry. New York: Facts on File.
Lehman, D. (2006). The Oxford Book of American Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McMahan, J. (2000). Animals: the Differences Between Human Beings and Other Animals. Animal Ethics. Vol.1, No.1. (November 2000).
Modern American Literature. (1999). Carolina: St. James Press.
Oliveira, S. R. (2013). Intermediality in Elizabeth Bishop’s Poetry. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, no. 39.
Vendler, H. (1987). The Poems of Elizabeth Bishop. Critical Inquiry,Vol. 13, No. 4 (Summer, 1987), pp. 825-838.
It is the policy of the Journal of Duhok University to own the copyright of the technical contributions. It publishes and facilitates the appropriate re-utilize of the published materials by others. Photocopying is permitted with credit and referring to the source for individuals use.
Copyright © 2017. All Rights Reserved.
