INVESTIGATING THE TEFL/ESP PRACTITIONER’S DILEMMATIC CURRENT STATUS IN THE IRAQI KURDISTAN REGION
Abstract
As a specialist in TEFL/ESP, the writers of this research-paper submitted a proposal of a symposium about TEFL/ESP titled “Teaching ESP in Iraqi-Kurdistan Region: Reality & Prospects”, to the Deanery of the College of Languages/ Nawroz University in collaboration with the College of Administration & Economics/ Nawroz University. Four researches from three universities in Dohuk Governorate area delivered six papers on the platform of Kurdistan Hall/ Nawroz University.
Meanwhile, it was presumed in advance that the symposium attending-practitioners who usually teach the ESP programs would be of two types majoring:
- (Type 1) practitioners with TEFL-qualification, and
- (Type 2) practitioners with no TEFL-qualification but they teach ESP programs depending on the experience of using English as medium of instruction gained when they were postgraduate-students; their medium of study was English.
Hence, the writers of this research-paper in advance designed and prepared two versions of questionnaire forms to investigate the two types attending-practitioners’ readiness to teach ESP. The questionnaire versions was built upon the six dimensions (each with 3 parameters) of Kumaravadivelu’s cyclic module of TEFL (2012); aiming at investigating the extent the two types of practitioners could realize during their performances of teaching an ESP program, in order then to make a sort of comparison between the two groups’ achievements.
Two hypotheses were in mind:
- the ESP practitioners with TEFL-qualification could not fairly fulfill the objectives of teaching the scientific programs other than the TEFL programs, though they majored in English, and the ESP practitioners with non-TEFL-qualification could not fairly fulfill the objectives of their major-scientific-programs with no experience of how to use English as a medium of study. Distributing the questionnaire forms, collecting them back, analyzing the data, gathering the results, and making comparison between the 2-type-practitioners’ responses, the following findings were reached:
- The two investigated types of ESP practitioners could fairly satisfy the objectives built on Kumaravadivelu’s cyclic module.
- Significant differences were marked in favor of the type 2 practitioners, in respect of satisfying the needs of Kumaravadivelu’s cyclic module. Finally, certain recommendations were made about how to develop an advance ESP discipline.
Downloads
References
Aronoff, Mark & Rees-Miller, Janie (2006) edited. Handbook of Linguistics. Blackwell Publishing. USA & UK
Basturkmen, Helen (2006) Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. New Jersey. USA
Branden,Kris Van den (2006) edited. Task-Based Language Education. Cambridge Applied Linguistics. UK & New York
Carreon, Edwina; Balarbar Corazon V. (1997), A Paradigm for ESP Materials Preparation- a research paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English as a Second or Other Language (the Ohio State Univ. Columbus 1997), Dela Salle Univ. Manila/Philippines.
Crystal, David (2012) English as a Global Language. Cambridge University Press. UK
Crystal, David (2003) THE CAMBRIDGE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. Cambridge University Press. UK
Harmer, Jeremy (2007) The Practice of Teaching English Language. Pearson: Longman. UK
Hedge, Tricia (2003) Teaching and Learning in the Second language Classroom. Oxford University Press. UK
AT THE COLLEGES OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION' AND SUGGESTING AN UP-TO-DATE ONE. MA theses. University of Diyala. Baqubah. Iraq
Senior, Rose M. (2006) The Experience of language Teaching. Cambridge University Press. UK
Spolsky, Bernard & Hult, Francis M. (2008) edited. The handbook of Educational Linguistics. Blackwell Publishers. UK
Spolsky, Bernard (1999) edited. CONCISE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF EDUCATIONAL LINGUISTICS. Elsevier Science Ltd. Oxford
Widdowson, H. G. (2003) Defining Issues in English language Teaching. Oxford. UK
It is the policy of the Journal of Duhok University to own the copyright of the technical contributions. It publishes and facilitates the appropriate re-utilize of the published materials by others. Photocopying is permitted with credit and referring to the source for individuals use.
Copyright © 2017. All Rights Reserved.