TRACES OF SUSTAINABILITY PRINCIPLES IN ARCHITECTURE TEACHING PROGRAMS AT SALAHADDIN UNIVERSITY SURVEY AND ANALYSIS OF TEACHING COURSE BOOKS

  • CHRA HUNAR AHMED Dept. of Architecture, University Salahaddin, Kurdistan Region-Iraq
  • MAHMOOD AHMED KHAYAT Dept. of Architecture, University Salahaddin, Kurdistan Region-Iraq
Keywords: Sustainability, Architecture, Education, UIA, UNESCO

Abstract

The rising importance of the theory and principles of sustainability, and its high influence on architecture practice and education is very clear in a way that the term sustainable has been mentioned many times in the UIA\ UNESCO charter for architectural education (UIA, 2015), it is clearly stated (Architecture for a Sustainable Future) as one of its aims for architecture education. Traces of this influence can be detected by examining teaching course books of any architecture teaching institution, many western teaching institutions has developed tools for detecting theses influences, the (STAUNCH tool) is used to trace the level of engaging sustainability principles in Salahaddin University teaching program.

The paper managed to elaborate an assessment of Salahaddin University architecture teaching program status in terms of availability of sustainability principles, and raised some notes and recommendation on how to develop teaching programs to go with UIA\UNESCO aim (architecture for a sustainable future)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

MAHMOOD AHMED KHAYAT, Dept. of Architecture, University Salahaddin, Kurdistan Region-Iraq

 

 

References

• DEFRA (2003) Achieving a better quality of life: Review of Progress towards Sustainable Development, Government Annual Report 2002. London: Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
• Dutch committee & Niko R. (2013). Assessing sustainability and social responsibility in Higher Education Assessment Frameworks Explained. In: Piternel B., ed. Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions, Springer , New York, P:(121-139)
• Francisco J. Lozano & Rodrigo Lozano (2013), Developing the curriculum for a new Bachelor’s degree in Engineering for Sustainable Development. Published in: journal of cleaner production. February 2014.
• Hammond A.et.al, (1995), Environmental Indicators, world resource institute. Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 95-060903.
• International Society of Sustainability Professionals (2016), STAUNCH© (Sustainability Tool for Auditing for University Curricula in Higher-Education), in: http://www.sustainabilityprofessionals.org/resources/staunch%C2%A9-sustainability-tool-auditing-university-curricula-higher-education accessed in 27/04/2016
• IUCN/UNEP/WWF, Caring for the Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living, Gland, Switzerland (1991), p10. http://www.uow.edu.au/~sharonb/STS300/sustain/meaning/defarticle2.html Access (2016/04/12).
• Jones, P, Selly, D., Sterling, S. (2010).More than the sum of their Parts? Interdisciplinary and Sustainability. In: jones, P, Selly, D., Sterling, S. (eds).sustainability Education: Perspective and Practice across Higher Education. London: Earthscan.
• Lozano, R. & Peattie, K. (2007). Audit of Contributions of Cardiff University Curricula to Sustainable Development. Maribor, Slovenia: International Advanced Research Workshop on HESD.
• Lozano R. &Ken Peattie (2011), Assessing Cardiff University’s Curricula Contribution to Sustainable Development Using the STAUNCH(RTM) System, published in: SAGE, Vol 5(1): 115–128.
• Lozano R. (2013), Diffusion of sustainable development in universities’ curricula: an empirical example from Cardiff University, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(7), 637-644, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.07.005
• Lozano R. & Mary. K. W., (2013), Assessing sustainability in University curricula: case studies from the University of Leeds and the Georgia Institute of Technology, S. Caeiro et al. (Eds.). Switzerland: Springer international publishing.
• Lozano R. Jordi L. & Gary T. (2013), developing a university sustainability report: experiences from the University of Leed, In: Lozano, R. Jordi L. & Gary T., ed. Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions, Springer, New York, P:( 189-205)
• NAAB, National Architecture Accrediting Board, (2009). NAAB conditions for Accreditation. New York: AIA.
• Roorda N. (2012).Fundamental of sustainable development. London: Routledge.
• Roorda N. (2013b), a strategy and a toolkit to realize system integration of sustainable development (SISD). In: Niko Roorda, ed. Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions. Springer, New York, P: (101-121).
• Ray-Jones, A. (Ed.). (2000) Sustainable Architecture in Japan: The Green Buildings of Nikken Sekkei. GB: Wiley-Academy.
• Shari Z. & mohd fakri, (2006), towards a more sustainable architectural Education in Malaysia. Paper, published from: ALAM CIPTA, Intl. j. on sustainable tropical research & practice, vol.1, 2006.
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNESCO & Educating for a Sustainable Future (1997), EPD-97/CONF.401/CLD.1.
• UNESCO, (2014). World Conference on Education for Sustainable Development - Learning Today for a Sustainable Future. Access in 2016/ 04/ 17, from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=13&nr=466&menu=1561.
• Union of International Associations UIA, (2015), Aims. Open Yearbook. Access in 2017/02/13, from: http://uia.org/s/or/en/1100066265.
• UNESCO, Education for Sustainable Development Unit (ESD), (2016), access in 2016/04/17, from:http://www.unescobkk.org/education/esd-unit/definition-of-esd.
• Worldwatch Institute (2003) Vital Signs 2003, New York: W.W. Norton and Co.
• World Commission on Environment and Development Report: Our Common Future (1987), UN Documents, http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm.
Published
2017-07-27
How to Cite
AHMED, C. H., & KHAYAT, M. A. (2017). TRACES OF SUSTAINABILITY PRINCIPLES IN ARCHITECTURE TEACHING PROGRAMS AT SALAHADDIN UNIVERSITY SURVEY AND ANALYSIS OF TEACHING COURSE BOOKS. Journal of Duhok University, 20(1), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.26682/sjuod.2017.20.1.6