ANALYSIS OF CANAL TRANSPORTATION, CENTERING ABILITY AND REMAINING DENTIN THICKNESS OF DIFFERENT SINGLE FILE ROTARY SYSTEMS IN PRIMARY TEETH; A CBCT ASSESSMENT
Keywords:
Primary teeth:, Single file system:, Rotary instrumentation:, Reciprocating:, CBCT:, Endodontics:
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare canal transportation, centering ability, dentine thickness and instrumentation time of manual instrumentation (ISO standardized stainless steel K- file) and different single file system in primary root canals using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human lower primary second molar teeth with at least 7mm root length were randomly divided in to three groups (Group one- Hand K- files, Group two- One-Shape rotary, Group three- Wave One- Gold reciprocating) were included in the study. CBCT images were obtained before and after the instrumentation for each group. Canal transportation, centring ability, dentin thickness and instrumentation time were evaluated for each group.
Results: A significant difference was found in transportation, centering ability between Group one &Group two, Group one &Group three (P<0.05) at middle and apical levels of the canalsrespectively. A significant difference was found in dentin thickness between Group one &Group two, Group one& Group three (P<0.05) at apical level of the canals. Instrumentation time was less in Group two and Group three than Group one (P<0.05).No significant difference was found between Group two &Group three (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Use of single file system in primary teeth results in reduction of instrumentation time and maintains original shape of root canal.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1-Selvakumar, H., Kavitha, S., Thomas, E., Anadhan, V., and Vijayakumar, R. (2016). Computed tomographic evaluation of K3 rotary and stainless steel K file instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Diag Res, 10(1), 5-8.
2-Andronic, A. I. (2017). Prevalence Of Early Loss Of Primary Teeth In 6-10 Year Old School Children In Sibiu. Acta Medica Transilvanica, 22(4),128-129.
3-Katge, F., Patil, D., Poojari, M., Pimpale, J., Shitoot, A., and Rusawat, B. (2014). Comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning efficacy of manual instrumentation, rotary systems and reciprocating systems in primary teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc PedodPrev Dent, 32(4), 311-316.
4-Nerkar, R., Yadav, S., Mehta, V., and Joshi, P. (2015). Root Canal Preparation in Primary Teeth with Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files: A Review. J Adv Oral Res, 6(2), 1-4.
5- Chandrasekhar, P., Shetty, R. U., Adlakha, T., Shende, S., and Podar, R. (2016). A comparison of two NiTi rotary systems, ProTaper Next and Silk for root canal cleaning ability (An in vitro study). Indian J ConservEndod, 1(01), 22-24.
6- Weeks, S. and Bahcall, J. (2017). Continuous or reciprocating endodontic rotary files: Evidence-based clinical considerations. Dent Today, 36(10), 1-7.
7-Kuzekanani, M. (2018). Nickel–Titanium rotary instruments: Development of the single-file systems. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent, 8(5), 386-390.
8-Karova, E., and Topalova-Pirinska, S. (2014). Instrument life of two rotary NiTi single-file techniques with reciprocating and continuous rotation used in curved canals after a glide path creation. J IMAB, 20(1), 494-499.
9-Reddy, P. J., Kumar, V. S., Aravind, K., and Kumar, H. T. (2014). Canal shaping with one shape file and twisted files: a comparative study. J Clin Diag Res, 8(12), 1-3.
10-Ruddle, C. J. (2016). Single-file shaping technique achieving a gold medal result. Dent Today, 35(1), 1-7.
11-Berechet, D., Rad, I. A., Berce, C. P., Bumbu, B. A., VICAŞ, R. M., Berechet, M. C., and Cimpean, S. I. (2018). A micro-computed tomography study of morphological aspect of root canalinstrumentation with ProTaper Next and One Shape New Generation in mandibular molars. Rom J MorpholEmbryol, 59(2), 499-503.
12-Elnagar, M. H., Ghoname, N. A., and Ghoneim, W. M. (2018). Cleaning efficacy of rotary versus manual system for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Tanta Dent J, 15(1), 14-18.
13-Prabhakar, A. R., Yavagal, C., Dixit, K., and Naik, S. V. (2016). Reciprocating vs rotary instrumentation in pediatric endodontics: Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of deciduous root canals using two single-file systems. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 9(1), 45-49.
14-Gawdat, S. I., and El Nasr, H. M. A. (2018). Shaping ability and surface topography of WaveOne Gold and OneShape single files. EndodPract Today, 12(2), 109-118.
15-Ozen, B., and Akgun, O. M. (2013). A comparison of Ni-Ti rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molars. J Inter Dent and Med Res, 6(1), 6-8.
16- Prabhakar, A. R., Renuka, G. N., Saraswathi, V. N. and Chandrashekar, M. Y. (2018) A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Root Canal Preparations in Deciduous Teeth Using Self Adjusting Files- An In Vitro Study. Austin J Dent, 4(4), 1-4.
17-Puri, P., Mishra, A., and Malik, N.(2016). Comparative Evaluation Between Two NiTi Rotary Files Systems using CBCT. Int J Oral Health and Med Res, 5(2), 18-20.
18-Naseri, M., Paymanpour, P., Kangarloo, A., Haddadpur, S., Dianat, O., and Ketabi, M. A. (2016). Influence of motion pattern on apical transportation and centering ability of WaveOne single-file technique in curved root canals. Dent Res J, 13(1), 13-17.
19- Reddy, N. V., Daneswari, V., Patil, R., Meghana, B., Reddy, A., and Niharika, P. (2018). Three-dimensional assessment of root canal morphology of human deciduous molars using cone beam computed tomography: An In vitro Study. Inter J PedodRehabil, 3(1), 36-41.
20-Guillén, R. E., Nabeshima, C. K., Caballero-Flores, H., Cayón, M. R., Mercadé, M., Cai, S., and Machado, M. E. D. L. (2018). Evaluation of the WaveOne Gold and One Shape New Generation in Reducing Enterococcus faecalis from Root Canal. Braz Dent J, 29(3), 249-253.
21-Tambe, V. H., Nagmode, P. S., Abraham, S., Patait, M., Lahoti, P. V., and Jaju, N. (2014). Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of rotary protaper, one shape system and wave one system using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent, 17(6), 561-565.
22- Dhingra, A., Ruhal, N., and Miglani, A. (2015). Evaluation of single file systems Reciproc, Oneshape, and WaveOne using cone beam computed tomography–an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res, 9(4), 30-34.
23-Jellil, E. I. (2017). Evaluation of Canal Transportation Using Single File Rotary Systems, One Shape, Waveone GOLD and Reciproc in Simulated Curved Canals (in Vitro Study). Tikrit J Dent Sci, 5(1), 121-125.
24- Gandhi, A., and Gandhi, T. (2011). Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of hand Protaper files and rotary Protaper files by using micro computed tomography. Rev Sul-Bras Odontol, 8(4), 375-380.
25- Kumar, B. S., Pattanshetty, S., Prasad, M., Soni, S., Pattanshetty, K. S., and Prasad, S. (2013). An in-vitro Evaluation of canal transportation and centering ability of two rotary Nickel Titanium systems (Twisted Files and Hyflex files) with conventional stainless Steel hand K-flexofiles by using Spiral Computed Tomography. J Int Oral Health, 5(5), 108-115.
26-Nagaraja, S., and Murthy, B. S. (2010). CT evaluation of canal preparation using rotary and hand NI-TI instruments: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent, 13(1), 16-22.
27-Navós, B. V., Hoppe, C. B., Mestieri, L. B., Böttcher, D. E., Só, M. V. R., and Grecca, F. S. (2016). Centering and transportation: in vitro evaluation of continuous and reciprocating systems in curved root canals. J Conserv Dent, 19(5), 478-481.
28-D'Amario, M., De Angelis, F., Mancino, M., Frascaria, M., Capogreco, M., and D'Arcangelo, C. (2017). Canal shaping of different single-file systems in curved root canals. J Dent Sci, 12(4), 328-332.
29-Saberi, E., Farhad-Mollashahi, N., Bijari, S., and Daryaeian, M. (2018). Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Transportation by Three NiTi Single-File Systems in Curved Canals: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. Int J Dent, 2018: 1-6.
30-Saber, S. E. D. M., Nagy, M. M., and Schäfer, E. (2015). Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of W ave One, R eciproc and One S hape single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J, 48(1), 109-114.
31-Jeevanandan, G., and Thomas, E. (2018). Volumetric analysis of hand, reciprocating and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars using spiral computed tomography: An in vitro comparative study. Eur J Dent, 12(1), 21-26.
32-Madalena, I. R., Carneiro, S. V., Osório, S. D. R. G., da Silva, R. D. S. B., Gimenez, T., Pinheiro, S. L., and Imparato, J. C. P. (2018). Assessment of Extruded Debris in Primary Molars Comparing Manual and Reciprocating Instrumentation. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr, 18(1), 1-7.
33- Jardine, A. P., Santini, M. F., Zaccara, I. M., Só, M. V. R., and Kopper, P. M. P. (2016). Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study. Braz Oral Res, 30(1), 1-8.
34- Kanagasingam, S., Asem, B., Zainuddin, N. A., Nordin, R., and Patel, S. (2016). Micro computed tomography evaluation of canal preparation with protaper, waveone and reciproc rotary file systems. Int J Dent Med, 1, 55-59.
35- Pathak, S. (2016). In vitro comparison of K-file, Mtwo, and WaveOne in cleaning efficacy and instrumentation time in primary molars. J Health Res, 3(1), 60.
36-Zameer, M. (2016). Evaluation of radicular dentin remaining and risk of perforation after manual and rotary instrumentations in root canals of primary teeth: An in vitro study. J Pediatr Dent, 4(3), 57.
37-Shahriari, S., Abedi, H., Hashemi, M., and Jalalzadeh, S. M. (2009). Comparison of removed dentin thickness with hand and rotary instruments. Iran Endod J, 4(2), 69-73.
38-Chaudhary, N. R., Singh, D. J., Somani, R., and Jaidka, S. (2018). Comparative evaluation of efficiency of different file systems in terms of remaining dentin thickness using cone-beam computed tomography: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent, 9(3), 367-371.
39-Govindaraju, L., Jeevanandan, G., and Subramanian, E. M. G. (2017). Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur J Dent, 11(3), 376-379.
40-Abdul Karim, J. A. R. (2018). Rotary Systems Versus Manual K-File System in Primary Molar Root Canals - In Vitro Study. Int J Pediatr Dent; 2(2): 115-120.
2-Andronic, A. I. (2017). Prevalence Of Early Loss Of Primary Teeth In 6-10 Year Old School Children In Sibiu. Acta Medica Transilvanica, 22(4),128-129.
3-Katge, F., Patil, D., Poojari, M., Pimpale, J., Shitoot, A., and Rusawat, B. (2014). Comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning efficacy of manual instrumentation, rotary systems and reciprocating systems in primary teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc PedodPrev Dent, 32(4), 311-316.
4-Nerkar, R., Yadav, S., Mehta, V., and Joshi, P. (2015). Root Canal Preparation in Primary Teeth with Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files: A Review. J Adv Oral Res, 6(2), 1-4.
5- Chandrasekhar, P., Shetty, R. U., Adlakha, T., Shende, S., and Podar, R. (2016). A comparison of two NiTi rotary systems, ProTaper Next and Silk for root canal cleaning ability (An in vitro study). Indian J ConservEndod, 1(01), 22-24.
6- Weeks, S. and Bahcall, J. (2017). Continuous or reciprocating endodontic rotary files: Evidence-based clinical considerations. Dent Today, 36(10), 1-7.
7-Kuzekanani, M. (2018). Nickel–Titanium rotary instruments: Development of the single-file systems. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent, 8(5), 386-390.
8-Karova, E., and Topalova-Pirinska, S. (2014). Instrument life of two rotary NiTi single-file techniques with reciprocating and continuous rotation used in curved canals after a glide path creation. J IMAB, 20(1), 494-499.
9-Reddy, P. J., Kumar, V. S., Aravind, K., and Kumar, H. T. (2014). Canal shaping with one shape file and twisted files: a comparative study. J Clin Diag Res, 8(12), 1-3.
10-Ruddle, C. J. (2016). Single-file shaping technique achieving a gold medal result. Dent Today, 35(1), 1-7.
11-Berechet, D., Rad, I. A., Berce, C. P., Bumbu, B. A., VICAŞ, R. M., Berechet, M. C., and Cimpean, S. I. (2018). A micro-computed tomography study of morphological aspect of root canalinstrumentation with ProTaper Next and One Shape New Generation in mandibular molars. Rom J MorpholEmbryol, 59(2), 499-503.
12-Elnagar, M. H., Ghoname, N. A., and Ghoneim, W. M. (2018). Cleaning efficacy of rotary versus manual system for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Tanta Dent J, 15(1), 14-18.
13-Prabhakar, A. R., Yavagal, C., Dixit, K., and Naik, S. V. (2016). Reciprocating vs rotary instrumentation in pediatric endodontics: Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of deciduous root canals using two single-file systems. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 9(1), 45-49.
14-Gawdat, S. I., and El Nasr, H. M. A. (2018). Shaping ability and surface topography of WaveOne Gold and OneShape single files. EndodPract Today, 12(2), 109-118.
15-Ozen, B., and Akgun, O. M. (2013). A comparison of Ni-Ti rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molars. J Inter Dent and Med Res, 6(1), 6-8.
16- Prabhakar, A. R., Renuka, G. N., Saraswathi, V. N. and Chandrashekar, M. Y. (2018) A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Root Canal Preparations in Deciduous Teeth Using Self Adjusting Files- An In Vitro Study. Austin J Dent, 4(4), 1-4.
17-Puri, P., Mishra, A., and Malik, N.(2016). Comparative Evaluation Between Two NiTi Rotary Files Systems using CBCT. Int J Oral Health and Med Res, 5(2), 18-20.
18-Naseri, M., Paymanpour, P., Kangarloo, A., Haddadpur, S., Dianat, O., and Ketabi, M. A. (2016). Influence of motion pattern on apical transportation and centering ability of WaveOne single-file technique in curved root canals. Dent Res J, 13(1), 13-17.
19- Reddy, N. V., Daneswari, V., Patil, R., Meghana, B., Reddy, A., and Niharika, P. (2018). Three-dimensional assessment of root canal morphology of human deciduous molars using cone beam computed tomography: An In vitro Study. Inter J PedodRehabil, 3(1), 36-41.
20-Guillén, R. E., Nabeshima, C. K., Caballero-Flores, H., Cayón, M. R., Mercadé, M., Cai, S., and Machado, M. E. D. L. (2018). Evaluation of the WaveOne Gold and One Shape New Generation in Reducing Enterococcus faecalis from Root Canal. Braz Dent J, 29(3), 249-253.
21-Tambe, V. H., Nagmode, P. S., Abraham, S., Patait, M., Lahoti, P. V., and Jaju, N. (2014). Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of rotary protaper, one shape system and wave one system using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent, 17(6), 561-565.
22- Dhingra, A., Ruhal, N., and Miglani, A. (2015). Evaluation of single file systems Reciproc, Oneshape, and WaveOne using cone beam computed tomography–an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res, 9(4), 30-34.
23-Jellil, E. I. (2017). Evaluation of Canal Transportation Using Single File Rotary Systems, One Shape, Waveone GOLD and Reciproc in Simulated Curved Canals (in Vitro Study). Tikrit J Dent Sci, 5(1), 121-125.
24- Gandhi, A., and Gandhi, T. (2011). Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of hand Protaper files and rotary Protaper files by using micro computed tomography. Rev Sul-Bras Odontol, 8(4), 375-380.
25- Kumar, B. S., Pattanshetty, S., Prasad, M., Soni, S., Pattanshetty, K. S., and Prasad, S. (2013). An in-vitro Evaluation of canal transportation and centering ability of two rotary Nickel Titanium systems (Twisted Files and Hyflex files) with conventional stainless Steel hand K-flexofiles by using Spiral Computed Tomography. J Int Oral Health, 5(5), 108-115.
26-Nagaraja, S., and Murthy, B. S. (2010). CT evaluation of canal preparation using rotary and hand NI-TI instruments: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent, 13(1), 16-22.
27-Navós, B. V., Hoppe, C. B., Mestieri, L. B., Böttcher, D. E., Só, M. V. R., and Grecca, F. S. (2016). Centering and transportation: in vitro evaluation of continuous and reciprocating systems in curved root canals. J Conserv Dent, 19(5), 478-481.
28-D'Amario, M., De Angelis, F., Mancino, M., Frascaria, M., Capogreco, M., and D'Arcangelo, C. (2017). Canal shaping of different single-file systems in curved root canals. J Dent Sci, 12(4), 328-332.
29-Saberi, E., Farhad-Mollashahi, N., Bijari, S., and Daryaeian, M. (2018). Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Transportation by Three NiTi Single-File Systems in Curved Canals: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. Int J Dent, 2018: 1-6.
30-Saber, S. E. D. M., Nagy, M. M., and Schäfer, E. (2015). Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of W ave One, R eciproc and One S hape single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J, 48(1), 109-114.
31-Jeevanandan, G., and Thomas, E. (2018). Volumetric analysis of hand, reciprocating and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars using spiral computed tomography: An in vitro comparative study. Eur J Dent, 12(1), 21-26.
32-Madalena, I. R., Carneiro, S. V., Osório, S. D. R. G., da Silva, R. D. S. B., Gimenez, T., Pinheiro, S. L., and Imparato, J. C. P. (2018). Assessment of Extruded Debris in Primary Molars Comparing Manual and Reciprocating Instrumentation. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr, 18(1), 1-7.
33- Jardine, A. P., Santini, M. F., Zaccara, I. M., Só, M. V. R., and Kopper, P. M. P. (2016). Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study. Braz Oral Res, 30(1), 1-8.
34- Kanagasingam, S., Asem, B., Zainuddin, N. A., Nordin, R., and Patel, S. (2016). Micro computed tomography evaluation of canal preparation with protaper, waveone and reciproc rotary file systems. Int J Dent Med, 1, 55-59.
35- Pathak, S. (2016). In vitro comparison of K-file, Mtwo, and WaveOne in cleaning efficacy and instrumentation time in primary molars. J Health Res, 3(1), 60.
36-Zameer, M. (2016). Evaluation of radicular dentin remaining and risk of perforation after manual and rotary instrumentations in root canals of primary teeth: An in vitro study. J Pediatr Dent, 4(3), 57.
37-Shahriari, S., Abedi, H., Hashemi, M., and Jalalzadeh, S. M. (2009). Comparison of removed dentin thickness with hand and rotary instruments. Iran Endod J, 4(2), 69-73.
38-Chaudhary, N. R., Singh, D. J., Somani, R., and Jaidka, S. (2018). Comparative evaluation of efficiency of different file systems in terms of remaining dentin thickness using cone-beam computed tomography: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent, 9(3), 367-371.
39-Govindaraju, L., Jeevanandan, G., and Subramanian, E. M. G. (2017). Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur J Dent, 11(3), 376-379.
40-Abdul Karim, J. A. R. (2018). Rotary Systems Versus Manual K-File System in Primary Molar Root Canals - In Vitro Study. Int J Pediatr Dent; 2(2): 115-120.
Published
2020-01-19
How to Cite
SELIVANY, B. J., & AHMED, H. A. (2020). ANALYSIS OF CANAL TRANSPORTATION, CENTERING ABILITY AND REMAINING DENTIN THICKNESS OF DIFFERENT SINGLE FILE ROTARY SYSTEMS IN PRIMARY TEETH; A CBCT ASSESSMENT. Journal of Duhok University, 22(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.26682/sjuod.2020.22.1.1
Section
Pure and Engineering Sciences
It is the policy of the Journal of Duhok University to own the copyright of the technical contributions. It publishes and facilitates the appropriate re-utilize of the published materials by others. Photocopying is permitted with credit and referring to the source for individuals use.
Copyright © 2017. All Rights Reserved.
