EFFECIENCY OF DIFFERENT INJECTION OBTURATION TECHNIQUES IN PULPECTOMIZED DECIDUOUS TEETH USING RADIOGRAPH

DILAN SHAHGAN MOHAMED  TAHER; ABDULKAREEM  R. AL-MEZOURI

doi:10.26682/sjuod.2019.22.2.19

DILAN SHAHGAN MOHAMED TAHER Dept. of Pedodontic, College of dentistry, University of Duhok, Kurdistan Region-Iraq
ABDULKAREEM R. AL-MEZOURI Dept. of Conservative, College of dentistry ,University of Duhok, Kurdistan Region-Iraq

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26682/sjuod.2019.22.2.19

Keywords: KEY WORDS: Primary teeth, pulpectomy, root canal obturation, zinc oxide eugenol

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the quality of different obturation techniques in primary teeth (navitip, endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe and reamer as a control) by using peri-apical radiograph.

Materials and Methods: Eighty extracted human lower primary second molar teeth with minimum 7 mm root length were randomly divided in to four groups (Group one-navitip, Group two-endodontic pressure syringe, Group three – insulin syringe, Group four- reamer) were included in the study. Peri apical radiograph images were taken after the obturation for each group.To evalute over filling, under filling and optimal filling.

Result: The results showed no significant differences between the four groups for the length of obturation (P > 0.05). Navitip and endodontic pressure syringe showed the best results for the length of obturation (50.0% optimal fillings) and insulin syringe showed (45.o% optimal fillings) for the length of obturation. Reamer showed (40.0%).

Conclusion: The studies showed that all obturation techniques used didn’t provide ideal obturation with nearly comparable obturation quality for the techniques.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

REFERENCES
Allen K.R. (1979). Endodontic treatment of primary teeth. Aust Dent J, 24:347-51.
Aylard S.R. and Johnson R. (1987). Assessment of filling techniques for primary teeth. Pediatr Dent, 9(3):195-198.
Berechet, D., Rad, I. A., Berce, C. P., Bumbu, B. A., VICAŞ, R. M., Berechet, M. C., and Cimpean, S. I. (2018). A micro-computed tomography study of morphological aspect of root canal instrumentation with ProTaper Next and One Shape New Generation in mandibular molars. Rom J Morphol Embryol, 59(2), 499-503.‏
Coll J A. and Sadrian R. (1996). Predicting pulpectomy success and relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent, 18:57-63.
Dandashi M.B., Nazif M.M., Zullo T., Elliott M.A., Schneider L.G., and Czonstkowsky M. (1993). An in vitro comparison of three endodontic techniques for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent, 15:254-6.Elnagar M. H., Ghoname, N. A., and Ghoneim, W. M. (2018). Cleaning efficacy of rotary versus manual system for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Tanta Dent J, 15(1), 14-18.‏
Gesi A. and Bergnholtz G. (2003). Pulpectomy – studies on outcome, Endo Topics, 5: 57–70.
Guelmann M., McEachern M., and Turner C. (2004). Pulpectomies in primary incisors using three delivery systems: An in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 28:323-6.
Gutmann J.L., Kuttler S., Niemczyk S. (2010). Root Canal Obturation: An Update. Pennwell Publications, 1-11.
Ingle and Bakland (2003). Endodontic diagnostic procedures. Endodontics 5th Edition, 212- 218.
Jha M, Patil SD, Sevekar S, Jogani V, and Shingare P. (2011). Pediatric Obturating Materials and Techniques. Journal of Contemporary Dentistry,1(2):27- 32.
Jha M., Patil S.D., Sevekar S., Jogani V., Shingare P. (2011). Pediatric Obturating Materials And Techniques. Journal of Contemporary Dentistry, 1(2):27- 3Markovic D., Zivinovic V., and Vucetic M. (2005). Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 6(3): 133-8.
Memarpour M., Shahidi S., and Meshki R. (2013). Comparison of different obturation techniques for primary molars by digital radiography. Pediatr Dent, 35:236-40.
Moutaz B., Dandashi, Mamoun M., Nazif, Thomas Zullo, Margaret A. Elliott, Lawrence G. Schneider and Mario Czonstkowsky (1993). An in vitro comparison of the three endodontic techniques for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent, 15(4):254-256.
Nagar P., Araali V., and Ninawe N. (2011) An alternative obturation technique using insulin syringe delivery systemto traditional reamer: an in-vivo study. J Dent Oral Biosci, 2(2):7–9.
Pandranki J., Chitturi R.R., Vanga N.R., and Chandrabhatla S.K. (2017) A comparative assessment of different techniques for obturation with endoflas in primary molars: an in vivo study. Indian J Dent Res, 28(1):44–48.
Ravindranath Reddy P. V., Shivayogi M. Hugar, Anand Shigli, Suganya M, Shweta S Hugar and Pratibha Kukreja (2015). Comparative evaluation of efficiency of three obturation techniques for primary incisors-An in vivo study. International Journal of Oral Health and Medical Research. July-August; 2(2):15-18.
Reddy R., Hugar S.M., and Shigli A., Suganya M., Hugar S.S., and Kukreja P. (2015). Comparative Evaluation of Efficiency of Three Obturation Techniques for Primary Incisors- An In Vivo Study. IJOHMR J, 2: 2