FLEXURAL BEHAVIOR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS MADE WITH ORDINARY AND HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETES: EFFECT OF INTERFACIAL ROUGHNESS BETWEEN OLD AND NEW CONCRETES

  • YOUKHANNA ZAYIA DINKHA Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Duhok , Kurdistan Region-Iraq
  • JAMES H. HAIDO Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Duhok , Kurdistan Region-Iraq
  • MSHEER HASAN ALI Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Duhok , Kurdistan Region-Iraq
Keywords: Beam toughness, Hybrid concrete beams, Beam

Abstract

Present endeavor is devoted to investigate the flexural strength of beams fabricated by ordinary concrete (OC) and retrofitted with high strength concrete (HSC). Old part of beams is represented the deteriorated concrete; while the new part is referred to retrofitted portion of the deteriorated beam. Bond strength between two concrete parts of beam was enhanced via preparing rough interfacial surface in various ways, namely, sand blast, holes, grooves and steel brush. Experimental measurements are given in terms of flexural load – deflection relationship and cracking pattern of the beams. It is demonstrated that the beams with sand blast interfacial surface show reasonable performance with high flexural toughness and safer cracking at collapse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

 Abu-Tair AI, Rigden SR, Burley E. Testing the bond between repair materials and concrete substrate. ACI Mater J 1996; (November–December):553–558.
 Alaee FJ (2003). Retrofitting of reinforced concrete beams with CARDIFRC. Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol 7, p. 174.
 Alocer S, Jirsa J. Assessment of the response of reinforced concreate frame connections redesigned by jacketing. In: Proceedings of the Fourth US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. vol. 3. May; 1990. p. 295–304.
 Alcocer SM. RC frame connections rehabilitated by jacketing. J Struct Eng 1993;119(5):1413–31.
 ASTM, Manual of aggregate and concrete testing. American society of testing and materials Vol. 04-02, 2007.
 Austin S, Robins P, Pan Y. Tensile bond testing of concrete repairs. Mater Struct 1995; 28: 249–259.
 Bett BJ, Klingner RE, Jirsa JO. Lateral load response of strengthened and repaired reinforced concrete columns. ACI Struct J 1988;85(5):499–508.
 Brühwiler E, Denarié E (2008). Rehabilitation of concrete structures using ultra-High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concrete. The Second International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete, Kassel, Germany.
 Denarié E, Brühwiler E (2006). Structural rehabilitations wih ultra-high performance fibre reinforced Concrete. International Journal for Restauration of Buildings and Monuments, pp.453-467.
 Emmons PH. Concrete Repair and Maintenance. In: Part Three: Surface Repair, Section 6: Bonding Repair Materials to Existing Concrete. MA: R.S. Means Company; 1994. p. 154–163.
 Farhat F, Nicolaides D, Kanellopoulos A, and Karihaloo B (2007).High performance fiber-reinforced cementitious composite (CARDIFRC)-Performance and application to retrofitting.Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol.74, No. (1-2), pp. 151-167.
 Farhat F, Nicolaides D, Kanellopoulos A, and Karihaloo B (2010).Behaviour of RC Beams Retrofitted with CARDIFRC after Thermal Cycling. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol.22, No.21.
 Haleem, D. A., Kesserwani, G., and Caviedes-Voullime, D. (2015). Haar waveletbased adaptive finite volume shallow water solver. Journal of Hydroinformatics. Vol. 17(6):857-873
 Habel K (2004). Structural behaviour of composite UHPFRC-concrete elements.Doctoral Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
 Harris DK, Sarkar J, Ahlborn TM (2011). Interface Bond Characterization of Ultra-High Performance Concrete Overlays. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting.
 Hindo KR. In-place bond testing and surface preparation of concrete. Concrete Int 1990; (April):127–129.
 Julio E. N.B.S., Branco F. A.B., Silva V. D. (2004). Concrete-to-concrete bond strength: Influence of the roughness of the substrate surface. Construction and Building Materials 18 (2004) 675–681.
 Ramırez J.L., Barcena J.M., Urreta J.I., e Sanchez J.A. Repair of concrete columns with partial localized damages. Report T 2.1 and 2.2 BREU–0186–C, April 1991.
 Rodriguez M, Park R. Seismic load tests on reinforced concrete columns strengthened by jacketing. ACI Struct J 1994;(March–April):150–159.
 Rossi P (2002). Development of new cement composite material for construction, Innovation, and Developments in Concrete Materials and Construction.
 Santos and Julio (2011). Factors Affecting Bond between New and Old Concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 108(4).
 Sarkar J (2010). Characterization of the bond strength between ultra high performance concrete substrates.Master of Sciencei in Civil Engineering, Michigan Technological University.
 Saucier F, Pigeon M, Durability of new-to-old concrete bonding. In: Proceedings of the ACI International Conference Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Concrete Structures and Innovations in Design, Hong Kong. vol. 1. 1991. p. 689–707.
 Shin H-C., Wan Z. (2010). Interfacial Properties between New and Old Concretes. Second International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, Ancona, Italy.
 Silfwerbrand J. Improving concrete bond in repaired bridge decks. Concrete Int 1990;(September):121–126.
 Stoppenhagen DR, Jirsa JO, Wyllie Jr LA. Seismic repair and strengthening of a severely damaged concrete frame. ACI Struct J, 1995;(March–April):177–187.
 Talbot C, Pigeon M, Beaupre D, Morgan DR. Influence of surface preparation on long-term bonding of shotcrete. ACI Mater J 1994;(November–December):560–566.
 Tayeh B. A., Abu Bakar B. H., Johari M. A. M., Voo Y. L. Mechanical and permeability properties of the interface between normal concrete substrate and ultra-high performance fiber concrete overlay. Construction and Building Materials 36 (2012) 538–548.
 Tayeh B. A., Abu Bakar B. H., Johari M. A. M., Voo Y. L. Utilization of ultra-high performance fibre concrete (UHPFC) for rehabilitation – a review. Procedia Engineering 54, 525-538, 2013.
Published
2017-07-28
How to Cite
DINKHA, Y. Z., HAIDO, J. H., & ALI, M. H. (2017). FLEXURAL BEHAVIOR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS MADE WITH ORDINARY AND HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETES: EFFECT OF INTERFACIAL ROUGHNESS BETWEEN OLD AND NEW CONCRETES. Journal of Duhok University, 20(1), 570-579. https://doi.org/10.26682/sjuod.2017.20.1.50