A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF THE LANGUAGE OF WEBINARS: POLITICS BUILDING TASK

  • MARIA SALIM MOHAMAD
  • ALYA M.H.AHMED AL-RUBAI’I
Keywords: CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS, LANGUAGE OF WEBINARS, POLITICS BUILDING TASK

Abstract

ABSTRACT. This study aims at analyzing how through language use, power relations are built in webinars. Recently, webinars have become very popular as effective instructional tools in education. They are one type of multi-synchronous system used for online education. This study follows a qualitative methodology. Five webinars from Edweb.net meant for personalized professional learning are analyzed critically, and the texts are described and explained using James Paul Gee’s (2014a) approach and method of critical discourse analysis. According to the scope of this study, only the politics building task, among seven building tasks and the social language tool, the figured world tool, and the situated meaning tool are used as tools of inquiry for data analysis. This study clarifies how speakers give or take social goods from persons, institutions or things based on some ideological principles in certain social groups. It explains that speakers do not only say things through language but also do things and be things. It has been found out that teachers have the power of maintaining discipline and are authoritative in classroom management while students are given less power regarding discipline. Additionally, technology in the 21st century is seen as an innovative powerful source in education as in other fields too.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

REFERENCES
Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual review of Anthropology, 29(1), 447-466. Retrieved on Jan 20, 2019 from https://1211a172-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/pgletrasufms/Home/downloads/CriticalDiscourseAnalysis.pdf?attachauth=ANoY7crL0LlvRIokEhjrXXYGUXbV0kb7u127mYurWlmatBFuBitt2LRG6YKjU0UYZ_gehyv8r_d7YWfZ-2FU8EinXXipGTgjhLZHlQBYr-Dtu0ZBBCN3sIDcwlb85bPpaDovvVEJ3h8lt1eloC2U70rpgzEOwxs5z-yyyapKeba-NfORD5KdtK3azJ7FZFn-cyUFjpaWEH0ArngywC2VgMuHJVgzjTBDrET94v5NUgBWc6ZYzWQzQRghf13l1v4jAzH5O2D9-HeG&attredirects=0
Brookhart, S. (2015, Apr 29). Creating and using effective rubrics [webinar]. In assessment for learning. Retrieved fromhttps://media.edweb.net/edWebinar/?view=20150429edwebnet20
De Wet, M. (2014). Women in higher education: an analysis of narratives on gender in the workplace (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University). Retrieved on Jul 27, 2019 from: https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:fpjUd7qA9KsJ:scholar.google.com/+De+Wet,+M.+(2014).+Women+in+higher+education:+an+analysis+of+narratives+on+gender+in+the+workplace+(Doctoral+dissertation,+Stellenbosch:+Stellenbosch+University).&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. New York: Longman. Retrieved on Dec 16, 2019 from http://93.174.95.29/_ads/CDEAA94B594F1AC0BAD15568A6EBC6BE
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman. Retrieved on Oct 2nd, 2018 from http://93.174.95.29/_ads/E120D76506EC6EF73492937484ADCEBE
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Education. Retrieved on Nov 16, 2018 from http://93.174.95.29/_ads/DED2A8414AD8B849D0C48F2F7946F9C8
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. Retrieved on Oct 7, 2018 from http://93.174.95.29/_ads/ECCF85C33835F582A8EE632A6855C3E6
Fisher, J. F. (2017, Feb 21). Five tips for getting blended learning right [webinar]. In Differentiating instruction with educational technology. Retrieved from https://media.edweb.net/edWebinar/?view=20170221edwebnet6
Fortuño, B. B., & Gómez, I. F. (2005). Spoken academic discourse: An approach to research on lectures. Revista española de lingüística aplicada, (1), 161-178. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Inmaculada_Fortanet-Gomez/publication/28128935_Spoken_academic_discourse_An_approach_to_research_on_lectures/links/540447ea0cf2c48563b069ea.pdf
Gee, J. P. (2004). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical?. In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 49-80). London: Routledge. Retrieved on Feb 15, 2019 from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781410609786/chapters/10.4324/9781410609786-9.
Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from Jan 30, 2018 from https://www.joycerain.com/uploads/2/3/2/0/23207256/52_james_paul_gee-an_introduction_to_discourse_analysis__theory_and_method-routledge__2010_.pdf
Gee, J. P., & Handford, M. (Eds.). (2013). The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://books.google.iq/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Q2T6-LHp8T8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=Gee,+J.+P.,+%26+Handford,+M.+(Eds.).+(2013).+The+Routledge+handbook+of+discourse+analysis.+Routledge.&ots=Bv_s42tfRa&sig=ndfpDkUULkM1w8HYRHRK159ib_k&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Gee%2C%20J.%20P.%2C%20%26%20Handford%2C%20M.%20(Eds.).%20(2013).%20The%20Routledge%20handbook%20of%20discourse%20analysis.%20Routledge.&f=false
Gee, J. P. (2014a). An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method (4th ed.). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from Jan 24, 2019 form james.gee@asu.edu
Gee, J. P. (2014b). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from Jan 24, 2019 form james.gee@asu.edu
Gee P. J. (2018). Discourse analysis: From grammar to society. New York: Routledge. Retrieved on Jan 24, 2019 form james.gee@asu.edu
Gee, J. P. (2019, January 4). Critical Discourse Analysis [E-mail to the researcher]. Duhok.
Holden, Sh. (2017, Oct 24). Classroom management tips for new teachers [webinar]. In Teacher help. Retrieved from https://www.edweb.net/?ewWebinarsBrowse@@.bebc200
Hudson, T. (2017, Jan 24). Leading, implementing, and sustaining innovations in personalized learning [webinar]. In leadership and innovation. Retrieved from https://media.edweb.net/edWebinar/?view=20170124edweb40
Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., Pascot, D., & Bytha, A. (2014). UTAUT model for blended learning: The role of gender and age in the intention to use webinars. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 10(1), 33-52. Retrieved from: http://www.ijello.org/Volume10/IJELLOv10p033-052Khechine0876.pdf
Lillard, Ch. (2018, Sep 17). Strategies for lesson planning and instruction for English language learners [webinar]. In helping ELL/ESL students succeed. Retrieved from https://media.edweb.net/edWebinar/?view=20180917edweb68
O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. Companion to discourse, 120-137. Retrieved from: http://multimodal-analysis-lab.org/_docs/pubs14-OHalloran%28in%20press%202011%29-Multimodal_Discourse_Analysis.pdf
Rogers, R. (2004). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 31-48). Routledge. Retrieved on April 22, 2019 from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781410609786/chapters/10.4324/9781410609786-8.
Sharan Sh., & Carucci J. (2014). Webinars for dummies. Canada: New Jersey. Retrieved from: https://get-ebooks.club/-/reader-roman/#/z=31490/s1=nwcbooks.com/q=Webinars%20For%20Dummies/
Van Dijk, T. A. V. (1988). News analysis. Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. New Jersey: Lawrence. Retrieved on Jan 22, 2019 from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.470.4348&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 1, 95-120. Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/30265525/methods_of_critical_discourse_analysis__ruth_wodak_and_michael_meyer_2001.pdf?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DA_dialectical-relational_approach_to_cri.pdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A%2F20190910%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20190910T205217Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=785268c00e3f0b6b54b2f9f553c664335ebd9d1098b0e0023779dda9bbfbf72c#page=104
Van Dijk, T. A. (2005). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In Language & peace (pp. 41-58). Routledge. Retrieved on May 20, 2019 from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=+Language+%26+peace+van+dijk&btnG=
Wang, S. K., & Hsu, H. Y. (2008). Use of the webinar tool (Elluminate) to support training: The effects of webinar-learning implementation from student-trainers’ perspective. Journal of interactive online learning, 7(3), 175-194. Retrieved on Jan 12, 2019 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/66b9/67863348deb093a70bc3abc83d96f6cd479e.pdf
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. Methods of critical discourse analysis. (63-95). Retrieved on Sep 30, 2018 from: https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/30215804/methods_of_critical_discourse_analysis__ruth_wodak_and_michael_meyer_2001.pdf?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DA_dialectical-relational_approach_to_cri.pdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A%2F20190823%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20190823T160741Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=98dbd5004be5d9959299cfa90c38f1b6211d878d913f7995a635611f064d7bce#page=72
Wodak, R. (2002). Aspects of critical discourse analysis. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik, 36(10), 5-31. Retrieved on Dec 15, 2018 from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/939e/d07528ca2c534455baa6fc1c6784138bf743.pdf
Wodak, R. (2004). Critical discourse analysis. C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, D. Silverman, (2007) Qualitative research practice (pp.185-201). London: Sage. London: Sage. Retrieved on Feb 12, 2019 from: http://93.174.95.29/_ads/66D196B73700CE034CD1F74AFAFA16D5
Wodak, R. (2011). Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. Discursive Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 50-69. Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.459.7306&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=67
Wodak, R. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse‐Historical Approach. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, 1-14. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ruth_Wodak/publication/280621881_Critical_Discourse_Analysis_Discourse-Historical_Approach/links/55bf4c7008ae092e966537d4.pdf
Yadav, P. K. (2011). Blogging as a means of professional development for ELT professionals. Journal of NELTA, 16(1-2), 123-132. Retrieved from: https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/NELTA/article/view/6136
Published
2020-06-02
How to Cite
MOHAMAD , M. S., & AL-RUBAI’I, A. M. (2020). A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF THE LANGUAGE OF WEBINARS: POLITICS BUILDING TASK. Journal of Duhok University, 22(2), 349-364. Retrieved from http://journal.uod.ac/index.php/uodjournal/article/view/583
Section
Humanities and Social Sciences