RESPONSE YIELD AND SOME GROWTH PARAMETERS OF BREAD WHEAT TO NANO AND NITROGEN FERTILIZERS

  • MOHAMMED ALI HUSSAIN Dept.of Field Crops, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Duhok
  • OMER ANWAR OMER Dept.of Field Crops, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Duhok
  • HOGIR SALIM MOHAMMED Dept.of Soil and Water sciences, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Duhok
Keywords: Nano fertilizer, Nitrogen, Bread wheat, Yield components

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to evaluate the influence of Nano and nitrogen fertilizers on grain yield and some growth parameters of bread wheat. The field experiment was carried out at the farm of field crop department, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Duhok. The experimental units included of Nano fertilizer and four levels of nitrogen fertilizer (0, 20, 30 and 40 Kg ha-1). Each experimental units consisted of four rows for each varieties. The data analyzed according to factorial experiment in randomize block design with three replications. Results indicated that the significant response is obvious due to varieties, Holler variety was superior in leaf area (60.98cm2), number of grain spike-1 (49.46) and spike length (11.05cm), while the nitrogen application exhibited a significant effect at nitrogen levels on all studied characters and the highest values for leaf area (64.65cm2), total grain yield (5.0635 ton/ha) and 1000 grain yield (32.75gm) was recorded at rate 40 Kg ha-1. For the interaction between Nano, nitrogen fertilizers and wheat varieties, the results indicated that the maximum values were recorded by Holler variety and 40 Kg ha-1 of nitrogen fertilizer, indicating that positive influence of nitrogen and Nano-fertilizer on yield, some growth parameters and grain yield were related to better performance of variety. For variation in agronomic efficiency (AE), the maximum value was recorded by Holler variety and also the results exhibited the highest value for grain yield response index (GYRI). The Holler cultivar was more than Adana-99 and the values ranged 15% to 36% compare with 7% to 16% for Adana-99.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aleum D., Firew M. and D. Tadesse. (2019). Genetic variability studies on bread wheat (Triticum estivum L.) genotyoes. J. of plant breeding and Crop Scince. 11(2): 41-54.
Ali N. S. and H. A. Al-Juthey. (2017).The application of nanotechnology for micronutrient in agriculture production (review article). The Iraqi J. of Agr. Sci. 9(48): 441-489.
Amanel, G. Kuhne. R. F., Tanner. D. G. and P.I.G. Vlet. (2002). Pecovery of 15 N labeled urea applied to wheat in the Ethiopian Higlands aflected by P fertilization. J. Agron. Crop Sci.: 189: 30-38.
Amare A. (2017). Response of bread wheat varieties to different seedling rate for growth, yield and yield components in Komboleha. Ethiopia. J.of Bio. Agric. And Healthcare (7) (23):79-91.
Beyenesh. Z.’ Nigussie D. and A. Fetien. (2017). Yield and nutrient use efficiency of bread wheat as influenced by time and rate of nitrogen application in Enderta, Tigray, Nothern Ethiopia. Open Agriculture 2, 1: 611-624.
Debre M. (2017). Response of bread wheat (Triticum estivum L.) varieties to different seed rate for growth, yield and yield components in Kombolcha District, North. Eastern Ethiopia. J. of Biology, Agric. And Healthcare. 7(23): 79-91.
Delogu G., Cattivelli L., Pecchioni N., Falcis D. De., Muagiore T. and A. M. Stanca. (1998). Uptake and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen in winter barley and winter wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 9: 11-20.
El-Metwally and Suady. (2009). Herbicide tank-mixuers efficiency on weed and wheat productivity. Annals. Agric. Sci. Moshtohor. 47(2): 99-109.
Fageria N. K. and M. C. Barbosa Filho (1981). Screening rice cultivars for higher efficiency of phosphorus absorption. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. Brasilia. 26:777-782.
Fresew B., Nigussie D., Adamu M. and Tamado. (2018). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer rate on grain yield and nitrogen uptake and use efficiency of bread wheat (Triticum estivum L.) varieties on the vertisols of central high land of Ethiopia. Agric. And Food secur. 7(78): 2-12.
Heineman, A.B.,Stone, L. F., Didonet, A. D., Trindade, M. G. and A. D. Canovas. (2006). Eficienica de use da radiacao solar na prodatividade de trigo decorrent da adubacao nitrogenada. Revist Brasileira de Engenharia Agricolae Ambiental. 10, 2: 352-356.
Hussain, M.A., Dohuki, M.S.S. and Ameen, H.A., (2017). Response of some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars to nitrogen levels. Kufa Journal for Agricultural Sciences, 9(4), pp.365-390.
Hussain. M, Ftohar, H. and S. Hatn. (2002). Growth, yield and quality response at three wheat (T. estivan L) varieties to different levels of N, P, K. Int. J. Agric. Bio. (4), (3) 362-364.
Izzat S. A. T.; Elfadi M. E. E.; Mohamed A. S. I.; AbuSefyan I. S. and O. S. Abdulla. (2020). Genetic grain in wheat grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency at different nitrogen levels in an irrigated hot environment. Hindawi. Com/jounals/ija/2020/9024671.
Kutrnan, U. B., Yidiz, B. and I. Cakmak, (2011). Effect of nitrogen on uptake, remobilization and partitioning of zinc and iron throughout the development of durum wheat. Plant and soil, 342, 1-2: 149-164.
Lopez-Bellido L., Lpez-Bellido R. J. and R. Redondo. (2005). Nitrogen efficiency in wheat under rain fed Mediterranean condition as affected by split nitrogen application. Field crop. Res. 94:86-97.
Morsy A.S.M., A. A. Awadalla and M. M. Sherif. (2018). Effect of Irrigation, Foliar spray with nano-fertilizer (Lithovit) and nitrogen levels on productivity and quality of Durum wheat under Toshka conditions. Assiut. J. Agric. Sci., 4993): 1-26.
Naderi M.; A. A. D. Shahraki and R. Naderi. (2011). Application of nanotechnology in the optimization of formulation of chemical fertilizers. Iran J. Nanotech. 12: 16-23.
Nemat A. N. O. Urldin, Saudy H. S., Ashmay F. and H. M. Saed. (2013). Grain yield response index of bread wheat cultivars influenced by nitrogen levels. Annal. Of Agricultural Science. 58(2): 147-152.
Rameshaiah G. N. and S. Jpallavi. (2015). Nano-fertilizer a nano sensors an attempt for developing smart agriculture. Intern. J. Engineering Res, and General Sci. 3(1): 314-320.
SAS Institute. (2002). SAS/ATAT User’s Guide. In: Vresion 9.1., SAS Institute Cary, NC.
Saudy H. S., Habbal M. S. and Kh. Iman. (2008). Genotypes x environment interaction for grain yield wheat genotypes tested water stress conditions. Sci. Int. 992): 133-137.
Singh M. D.; Gautam C.; Patidar O. P.; Meena H. M.; Rasha G. and Vishwajith. (2017). Nano fertilizer is a new way to increase nutrients use efficiency in crop production. International J. of Agri. Review article. International J. of Agri. Sci. 9(7): 3831-3833.
Tamado T., Dawit D., and J. Sharma. (2015). Effect of weed management methods and nitrogen fertilizer rates on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of bread wheat in Southern Eth. East Afr. J. Sci. 9(1): 15-30.
Wendling, A., Eitz, F.L.F., and T. Lovato. (2007). Recomendacao de adubacao nitrogenada para trigoem sucessaoao milhoe soja sob Sistema plantio direto no paraguai. Revista Brasilerra de Ciencia do Solo. 31 (5): 985-994.
Published
2021-05-03
How to Cite
HUSSAIN, M. A., OMER, O. A., & MOHAMMED, H. S. (2021). RESPONSE YIELD AND SOME GROWTH PARAMETERS OF BREAD WHEAT TO NANO AND NITROGEN FERTILIZERS. Journal of Duhok University, 24(1), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.26682/ajuod.2021.24.1.7
Section
Agriculture and Veterinary Science