EFFECT OF TREFLAN HERBICIDE AND PHOSPHORUS LEVELSON WEEDS AND CHICK PEA YIELD

MOHAMMED ALI HUSSAN; ABBAS ALO KHETHER; FAHMI HAJI MOURAD; WISAM KHALID SABRI

doi:10.26682/avuod.2017.20.1.11

MOHAMMED ALI HUSSAN Dept. of field crops, Collegeof Agriculture, University of Dohuk, Kurdistan Region-Iraq
ABBAS ALO KHETHER Dept. of field crops, Collegeof Agriculture, University of Dohuk, Kurdistan Region-Iraq
FAHMI HAJI MOURAD Dept. of field crops, Collegeof Agriculture, University of Dohuk, Kurdistan Region-Iraq
WISAM KHALID SABRI Dept. of field crops, Collegeof Agriculture, University of Dohuk, Kurdistan Region-Iraq

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26682/avuod.2017.20.1.11

Keywords: Herbicide, weed, chickpea

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in Research Farm of Agriculture College, Duhok University during growing season of 2017 in tow sowing dates (20/2 and 10/3/1917) to investigate four levels of Treflan herbicide (0, 1.200, 2.400, and 3.200) L ha^-1,) and four phosphorous level ((0, 140, 180 and 220) Kg P₂O₅ ha^-1. on growth of weed, yield and yield components of chickpea. Treatments arranged in factorial experiment based on Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The results revealed that treflan and phosphorous levels showed considerable reduction on number and dry weight of broad narrow leaved weeds, and significant effect on yield and yield components of chickpea were recorded under interaction (H₃ P₃ D₁) and produced the highest values (1.5, 76.4, 34.3 g, 6.9 g and 58.3cm) for number of seeds pod^-1, seeds plant^-1, 100-grain weight, grain yield plant and height of the lowest pod.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

 Ahlawat, I. P. S., Singh, A. and Saraf , C, S. 1981.Effect of winter legumes on the nitrogen economyand productivity of succeeding cereals. Experimental Agriculture 17: 57-62.
 Auld, P. and Lee, G. A. 1981. Chickpea, a potential pulse crop for northern Idaho. Current Information Services. Idabo Agricultural Experiment Station No. 570.
 Bhalla, U. S. (2002a) Use of Kinetikit and GENESIS for modeling signaling pathways. Meth. Enzymol. ,345: 3-23. (http://doqcs. ncbs.res.in/).
 Bhalla. C. S, S. P. Kurchaniaad, N. R. Paradkar. 1998. Herbicidal weed control in chickpea (Cicer ariteinum L.). World weeds, J. (1-2):121-124.
 Faroda, A. S. and Sing R. C. 1981. Weed control in pulses. Pulse Crop Newsletter 1: 50-51.
 Faroda, A. S. and Sing R. C. 1981. Weed control in pulses. Pulse Crop Newsletter 1: 50-51.
 Gawai P.P. and V. S. Pawar. 2007. Nutrient balance under INMS in sorghum chick pea cropping sequence. Indian J. Agric. Res., 41(2): 137-141.
 Gebreyeus, Br, Te, 2014. Response of yield and yield component of Tef [Eragrostis tef(Zucc.) Trotter] to tillage, nutrient, and weed mangment practices in Dura Area, Northern Ethipia. International Scholarly Research Notices. N. 439718. 9-19.
 Hassan, G. Khan. T. 2007. Post emergence herbicides control asphodels tenuifolius in desi chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)Luckv Marwat, Pakistan,Pak. J. weed Sci. Res. 13(1-2, 33-3
 Holmes, R. C, and C. L. Sprague. 2013. Row width affects weed management in Type II black bean. Weed control. 27, 3 P: 538-546.
 Kumar, B. V and Sreenivasulu. 2004. Integrated nutrient management. Sci. Teck: the Hindu, online Edition of India's National newspaper, Thursday 12th August. 2004.
 Mahajan, A and R. Sharma. 2005. Integrated management ( INM) system-concept, need and future strategy. Agrobios NewsLetter, 4(3): 29-32.
 Muhammad. A, A-Anwar, A-Arif, M. Nadeem and A. Zahid. 2010. Screening of pre and post emergence herbicides against chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.) weeds under semi rain fed conditions of Pothohar, Pakistan. Pak. J. Weed sci. Res. 16 (4): 421-430.
 Patel, B. D., J. B. Patel and R. B. Patel. 2006. Effect of fertilizer and weed management practices on weed control in chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L) ander middle Gujarat conditions. Indian J. crop science , 1 (1-2) : 180-183.
 Sawhncy, V., Amarjit , and Singh, R. 1985. Effect of applied nitrate on growth and N- fixation in Cicer arientinum L. Plant and Soil 86: 233-240.
 Sexena, Mc. (1976). Problems and potential of chickpea production in the nineties. Proc. 2 d2 inter, workshop on chickpea improvement, ICRISAT Center, India, pp 13-28.
 Shabeer K. B. Shahbaz. 2015. Effect of phosphorous levels on growth and r. A. B; K. Mian; U. B. Sana; and yield of chick pea (Cicer avetinum L.) varieties. Journal of Natural science Research. 5. 3 164- 176.
 Steel, R. G. D and J. H Torrie, 1984. Principle and procedures of statistics. 2nd ed. MC Graw Hill Book Co-Singapore PP : 172-177.
 Teuwari A. N. Tiwari S. N. Rathi J.P.S. Verma R. N. Tripathi A. K. 2001. Crop weed competition studies having Asphodelus tenuifolius dominated weed community condition under rain fed condition. Ind J. Weed Sci, 33:198-199.
 Thorat, S. T. 2004. Effect of irrigation regimes , weed management and growth regulators on protein and dry pod yield of ground nut grown under polythene mulch. Inter. Arachis –Newsletter, 24 : 45- 47.
 Upadhyay, V. B and C. S. Bhalla. 2002. Efficacy of cultural mechanical and chemical weed control in chickpea (Cicer aretinumL.). Indian. J. Weed sci. 34: 141-142.
 Yadav. D. S. and S. B. Sing .(1988). Efficacy of mechanical and chemical weed control in chickpea (Cicer ariteinum L.). Ann. Agric.Res. 9 (2): 256 – 258.