VOWEL LENGTH AS AN ORDERING CONSTRAINT IN BADINI KURDISH BINOMIALS: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS

Saaed A. Saaed

doi:10.26682/hjuod.2017.20.2.7

Saaed A. Saaed University of Duhok, College of Humanity Sciences

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26682/hjuod.2017.20.2.7

Abstract

Major studies on binomial order (Cooper and Ross, 1975; Wright et al. 2005; Benor and Levy, 2006; Lohmann 2011; Mollin, 2012; Saaed, 2013) commonly agree that vowel length has a key role in the linear ordering of words in binomial phrases. Therefore, vowel length has been regarded as one of the basic phonological constraints of binomial order. The current study examines the role of vowel length as an ordering constraint in binomial phrases in Badini Kurdish. It proposes the hypothesis that there is a preference in Badini Kurdish binomials to place the word containing the shorter vowel in the first position and the word containing the longer vowel in the second position. To confirm the productive existence of this pattern in Badini Kurdish binomials, the study employs a quantitative analysis approach which is generally regarded as the most up-to-date research methodology used in the relevant literature. After applying the quantitative analysis to a big number of Badini Kurdish binomials (263 pairs), the study has come up with the finding that there is an outstanding preference for the ordering pattern hypothesized in this study. It has also been found that this ordering preference is statistically highly significant. Thus, the study concludes that this finding proves that vowel length can be considered an ordering constraint in Badini Kurdish binomials where the preference is frequently given for placing the words with the shorter vowels in the first position. Finally, it has to be pointed out that this finding is compatible with similar studies on binomials in other languages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abraham, R. D. (1950). Fixed order of coordinates: A study in comparative lexicography. Modern Language Journal , 34, pp. 276–287.
Behaghel, O. (1909). Beziehungen zwischen umfang und reihenfolge von satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen , 25, pp. 110–142.
Benor, S. B., & Levy, R. (2006). The chicken or the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English binomials. Language , pp. 233–278.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
Bolinger, D. L. (1962). Binomials and pitch accent. Lingua , 11, pp. 34–44.
Cooper, W., & Ross, J. (1975). World order. In R. E. Grossman, L. J. San, & J. J. Vance (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on functionalism (pp. 63–111). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Cutler, A., & Cooper, W. E. (1978). Phoneme-monitoring in the context of different phonetic sequences. Journal of Phonetics , 6, pp. 221–225.
Gerard, G., & Daniel, M. (1998). Preliminary Reflection of the Constitution of a National Corpus of Kurdish Language. Retrieved 1 12, 2016, from http:/ggautierk.free.fre/1-project.htm/
Gustafsson, M. (1984). The syntactic features of binomial expressions in legal English. Text , 4, pp. 123–142.
Hamasoor, S. (2007). A syntactic and semantic study of collocation in English and Kurdish. Unpublished MA thesis: University of Suleimaniya.
Hasan, A. M. (2012). Kurdish Intonation with Reference to English . Unpublished PhD thesis: University of Ulster, UK. .
Jameel, H. K. (2013). Binomials in English and Kurdish: A contrastive study. Unpublished MA thesis: University of Duhok.
Jespersen, O. (1905). Growth and structure of the English language. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
Kurdish, A. o. (1992). Retrieved 1 12, 2016, from Kurdish Academy of Language: http://www.kurdishacademy.org/
Lohmann, A. (2011). Beyond irreversible binomials – a processing view on constituent order in coordinate constructions. PhD thesis: University of Hamburg.
Malkiel, Y. (1959). Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua , 8, pp. 113–160.
Masini, F. (2006). Binomial constructions: Inheritance, specification and subregularities. Lingue e Linguaggio , 5 (2), pp. 207–232.
Mollin, S. (2012). Revisiting binomial order in English: Ordering constraints and reversibility. English Language and Linguistics , 16 (1), pp. 81–103.
Morawski, J. (1927). Les formules rimees de la langue Espagnole. Revista de Filologia Espanalo , XIV, pp. 113–133.
Oakeshott-Taylor, J. (1984). Phonetic factors in word order. Phonetica , 41 (4), pp. 226–237.
Oden, G. C., & Lopes, L. L. (1981). Preference for order in freezes. Linguistic Inquiry , 12 (4), pp. 673–679.
Pinker, S., & Birdsong, D. (1979). Speakers' sensitivity to rules of frozen word order. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 18, pp. 497–508.
Ross, J. R. (1982). The sound of meaning. In T. L. Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 275–290). Seoul: Hanshing Publishing.
Saaed, S. (1997). Binomial expressions in Iraqi Arabic with reference to English: A phonopragmatic approach. Unpublished M.A. thesis: University of Mosul.
Saaed, S. (2013). Binomials in Modren Standard Arabic with Reference to English: An investigation of ordering constraints. Unpublished PhD thesis: University of Essex, UK.
Saaed, S., & Simo, H. (forthcoming 2016). The short-before-long preference tendency as an ordering constraint in Badini Kurdish binomials: A quantitative analysis. The journal of the University of Duhok.
Thackston, W. M. (2006). Kurmanji Kurdish: A reference grammar with selected readings. Retrieved 1 12, 2016, from http: //www.fas.harvard.edu/Iranian/kurmanji/kurmanji-complete.pdf/.
Wright, S. K., Hay, J., & Bent, T. (2005). Ladies first? Phonology,frequency, and the naming conspiracy. Linguistics , 43 (3), pp. 531–561.
Wright, S., & Hay, J. (2002). Fred and Wilma: A phonological conspiracy. In S. Benor, M. Rose, D. Sharma, J. Sweetland, & Q. Zhang (Eds.), Gendered practices in language (pp. 175–191). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications