THE ANTHROPOGENIC AND CLIMATE APOCALYPSE IN MICHAEL CRICHTON’S STATE OF FEAR: AN ECOCRITICAL STUDY

  • SHOKHAN RASOOL AHMED Dept, English, College of Languages, University of Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region-Iraq
Keywords: Anthropogenic, Climate Apocalypse, State of Fear, Global Warming

Abstract

State of Fear (2004) by Michael Crichton (1942-2008) is an ecocriticism novel that delves into the sensitive topic of climate change. The ecocritical approach considers nature as a prevalent factor through the belief that natural forces widely determine human evolution as a community. According to ecocritics, the human world is not developed solely by linguistic and social factors (Milner 2022, p. 18). The two elements are just among the many aspects accountable for the presence and progress of people. Generally, life, including human life, is extremely influenced by the functions of nature and the environment. Therefore, according to the ecocriticism theory, nature is a critical element of human life.

After changing into the discipline of theory, eco-criticism was divided into sections. One of the parts developed into reviewing and interpreting the functions of nature, images, and natural items in the literacy works generated by scholars worldwide. Ecocriticism assumes a prominent position within the realm of literary studies due to its capacity to explore and elucidate the inherent ecological distinctions among various geographical settings. However, the main source of thoughts, study, and results in ecocritical research will always come from the authors and poets who are famous and well-developed in literature (Hansen 2020, p.146). Using an Ecocritical approach, the paper seeks to apply Michael Crichton's concepts of the environment through global warming. The paper aims to determine the relationship between literature and scientific data on global warming. Moreover, it analyzes the significant concepts of the novel State of Fear to develop a clear understanding of the author's perception and political ideologies concerning global warming. It also seeks to ascertain future global warming effects' validity

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, M. (2005). A novel view of global warming. Nature, 433(7023), 198–198. https://doi.org/10.1038/433198a
Ball, P. (2004). Brought to book. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/news041220-4
Baysal, K. (Ed.). (2021). Apocalyptic Visions in the Anthropocene and the Rise of Climate Fiction. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Boykoff, M. T., & Rajan, S. R. (2007). Signals and noise. Mass-media coverage of climate change in the USA and the UK. EMBO Reports, 8(3), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400924
Crichton, M. (2004). State of Fear. Harper Collins Publishers.
Ekwurzel, B. (2005). Crichton Thriller State of Fear | Union of Concerned Scientists. Www.ucsusa.org. https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/crichton-thriller-state-fear#1
Garrard, G. (2023). Ecocriticism. Taylor & Francis.
Hansen, C., 2020. Ecothriller heroics: Affect and spectatorship in fictions of climate change. Journal of European Popular Culture, 11(2), pp.145-156. https://doi.org/10.1386/jepc_00023_1
IPCC. (2001). Climate Change 2001: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Third Assessment Report. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/SYR_TAR_full_report.pdf
Milner, A., 2022. ANTHROPOCENE FICTION AND WORLD-SYSTEMS ANALYSIS ANDREW MILNER AND JR BURGMANN. New Perspectives on International Comparative Literature, p.18. https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=spiDEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA18&dq=michael+crichton%27s+global+warming&ots=eJa7K6TEj3&sig=8bbQtytvJRj6hAAca1KmhwgoYmE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
National Academies Press. (2001). Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions. In nap.nationalacademies.org. National Academy of Sciences . https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/10139/chapter/1
Oreskes, N. (2004). The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. Science, 306(5702), 1686–1686. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103618
Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt : how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury.
Pearce, F. (2010). The Climate Files: The Battle for the Truth about Global Warming. Guardian Books/Random House.
Perry, G. (2006). Global Climate Change: Should You Care? IGUANA, 13(2), 156–159.
Rust, B. W. (2006). Carbon Dioxide, Global Warming, and Michael Crichton’s “State of Fear.” Computing Science and Statistics, 37, 1–15.
Sandalow, D. B. (2005). Michael Crichton and Global Warming. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/michael-crichton-and-global-warming/
Vaughn, L. B. (2010). A Few Inconvenient Truths about Michael Crichton’s State Of Fear: Lawyers, Causes and Science. Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law, 49–84.
Weart, S. (2011). Global warming: How skepticism became denial. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 67(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340210392966
Whistle.Blower. (2008, November 7). Michael Crichton, author of State of Fear, leaves global warming disinformation legacy. Government Accountability Project. https://whistleblower.org/politicization-of-climate-science/global-warming-denial-machine/michael-crichton-author-of-state-of-fear-leaves-global-warming-disinformation-legacy/
Zwally, H. J. (2002). Surface Melt-Induced Acceleration of Greenland Ice-Sheet Flow. Science, 297(5579), 218–222. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072708
Published
2023-10-26
How to Cite
AHMED, S. R. (2023). THE ANTHROPOGENIC AND CLIMATE APOCALYPSE IN MICHAEL CRICHTON’S STATE OF FEAR: AN ECOCRITICAL STUDY. Journal of Duhok University, 26(2), 599-603. https://doi.org/10.26682/hjuod.2023.26.2.36
Section
Humanities and Social Sciences