AN ANALYSIS OF THE COMMON PAST TENSE ERRORS COMMITTED IN WRITING BY KURDISH LEARNERS OF EFL
Abstract
Writing is a challenging skill even in the first language, and it is more difficult to write in a foreign language. That is why most of the EFL learners make errors in EFL writing. Error analysis is the method used to identify, classify, explain, and correct errors made by first-year college students in their essays. Errors are significant in three different ways. Firstly, they inform teachers areas that students need more learning. Secondly, they are good evidence for researchers on how language is acquired. Thirdly, they are significant to the learners themselves, because through these error learners can know in which aspects of the language, they lack enough knowledge. This study attempts to analyze past tense errors made by first-year students in order to see what is the most difficult aspect of past tense for the learners. Ten narrative essays composed by Duhok university students were collected and analyzed. Errors made by students were classified into different types and counted in order to see the most frequent error as far as the past tense is considered. Results have shown that the most frequent types of errors were regular verbs in the past, irregular verbs in the past, past perfect tense, past continuous tense, and passive voice in the past. The findings of the study show that past continuous is the most problematic area of the past tense for the participants of this study.
Downloads
References
Al-Dubib, D. A. (2013). Error analysis of subject-verb agreement in the writing of EFL Saudi female students: A corpus-based study. (Master thesis, Al- Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Saudi Arabia). Retrieved from www.awej.org/index.php?option=com
Bayinah, S. (2013). The grammatical error analysis on using the simple past tense in writing recount text (a case study at the first grade on MA Al–Khairiyah) (Skripsi, SyarifHidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta).
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education Inc.
Corder, S. P. (1975). Error analysis, interlanguage, and second language acquisition. Language teaching and linguistic abstract. 8: 201 -17.
Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxfrod University Press.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gass, S., Selinker, L. (1994). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hourani, T. M. Y. (2008). An analysis of the common grammatical errors in the English writing made by 3rd secondary male students in the Eastern Coast of the UAE. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Dubai: British University.
Keshavarz, M. H. (1999). Contrastive analysis and error analysis. (6th ed.). Tehran: Rahman Publications.
Khansir, A. A. (2012). Error analysis and second language acquisition. Theory and practice in language studies, 2(5), 1027.
Murphhy, R. (1994). English grammar in use. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quirk, R., & Greenbaum, S. (1973). A university grammar of English. London: Longman.
Sridhar, S. N. (1975). Contrastive analysis, error analysis and interlanguage: Three phases of one goal? Studies in Language Learning, 1. No. ED123888.
Sun, J., & Shang, L. (2009). A Corpus-based Study of Errors in Chinese English Majors’ English Writing. Asian Social Science, 6(1), 86.
It is the policy of the Journal of Duhok University to own the copyright of the technical contributions. It publishes and facilitates the appropriate re-utilize of the published materials by others. Photocopying is permitted with credit and referring to the source for individuals use.
Copyright © 2017. All Rights Reserved.
