CHARACTERISTIC OF SPATIAL CONFIGURATION: ITS ROLE IN USER PERCEPTION IN CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE (Duhok city architecture as a case study)
Abstract
Spatial configuration as a phenomenon in architecture plays a crucial role in shaping the function, and ease of use, which affects user perception or may be influenced by user experience to form interactions that lead to an understanding of the built environment and then spatial configuration. This research paper was prepared in a way that aims to discover the influence of the user’s perception on characteristics of the built environment and the latter’s influence on the user’s perception. Through research into several previous studies, were able to identify a set of concepts that are directly related to the idea of spatial configuration and classified them into three types according to their characteristics: Syntactic characteristic is represented by (Integration). Geometric characteristic is represented by (Scale). Perceptual characteristics consist of (attention, Semantics, Visual communication, Ethics, Guidance, Meaning, Challenges, Materiality, and Vitality). These characteristics are used in measuring several cultural-educational and administration buildings in Dohuk Governorate, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, through the results of these methods. The first method is space syntax theory, The second method is a traditional analysis through mathematical calculations selected for this purpose. and the third is user participation in a questionnaire. Then, a comparison of the final result of the three methods. In the end, it was found that the form of the relationship between these characteristics is a directional nature. An increase in the form of one variable may lead to an increase or decrease in the other variable, it has also been shown that the function of the building affects the direction of this relationship.
Downloads
References
Alfirević, Đ. a.-A. (2019). Design principles for achieving spatiality in living space.
Ali, O. (2007). Legibility in the Urban Environment.
Andersson Schaeffer, J. (2011). Communication space: Spatial design in the manufacturing industry.
Andersson Schaeffer, J. (2011). Communication space: Spatial design in the manufacturing industry.
Awan, N. T. (2013). Spatial agency: Other ways of doing architecture.
Bell, D. a. (2020). Political theory and architecture.
Bowen, S. (2010). Critical theory and participatory design.
Carmona, M. (2021). Public places urban spaces.
Charoenchim, N. (2023). Participatory Design in Architecture: A toolkit to communicate needs between architects and users.
Ching, F. D. (2023). Architecture: Form, space, and order.
Devmane, S. O. (2022). "Human-building interaction towards a sustainable built environment: A review.
Dursun, P. (2009). Architects are talking about space.
Eşingen Kınayoğlu, G. (2022). The architectural cogitatio: a phenomenological critical realist contact for the ethical-political prognosis of the 21st-century architecture theory.
Fisher, T. .. (2008). Architectural design and ethics.
Fujita, H. (2019). A history and geography of contemporary architecture.
Gabr, M. M. (2019). Spatial configuration pattern an approach to space assessment.
Grant, C. A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your “house.
Grobler, A. a. (2006). Criteria for spatial definition: architectural and urban interiors of the Constitutional Court, Johannesburg.
Gudkova, T. V. (2017). "Spatial Modernist Architectural Artistic Concepts.".
Günaydin, A. S. (2020). Evaluation of the history of cities in the context of spatial configuration to preview their future.
Hasgül, E. (2015). Space as configuration: Patterns of space and culture.
Hay, R. e. (2018). Post-occupancy evaluation in architecture: experiences and perspectives from UK practice.
Hidayatun, M. I. (2014). Vernacular architecture as an alternative design approach with the interpretation of Paul Ricoeur’s critical theory.
Ibrahim, A. M. (2006). Architectural Design Process Based on Spatial Human Behavior Parameters through Computational Methodology." 5th International Conference on Mediterranean Cultures in Art and Architecture.
Işiklar, S. (2017). Vitality of the Cities.
Jamal-E-Din Mahdi Nejad, A. S. (2018). Interaction between Architecture and Environment; Investigating.
Jiang, B. C. (2000). Integration of space syntax into GIS for modelling urban spaces.
Karakas, T. a. (2020). Exploring the influence of the built environment on human experience through a neuroscience approach: A systematic review.
Katona, V. (2015). From static space to dynamic architecture: The changing principles of contemporary European church architecture.
Khalesian, M. P. (2009). . "A GIS-based traffic control strategy planning at urban intersections.
Khan, A. Z. (2014). Integrative spatial quality: A relational epistemology of space and transdisciplinarity in urban design and planning.
Kim, N. S. (2002). Challenges for architectural level power modelling.
Kim, Y. O. (1999). Spatial Configuration, Spatial Cognition and Spatial Behaviour: the role of architectural intelligibility in shaping spatial experience.
Klarqvist, B. (2015). A space syntax glossary.
Longo, D. A. (2022). PROXIMITY” AS A DESIGN STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE, COLLABORATIVE AND INCLUSIVE URBAN PUBLIC SPACES.
Martyniv, O. a. (2017). "Using a systematic approach in the analysis of the factors that influence on a form formation of buildings of higher educational establishments.
Mzoori, F. A. (2014). Spatial configuration and functional efficiency of house layouts.
Papastergiadias, N. ( 2010). Spatial aesthetics: Art, place and the everyday.
Piethaan, M. (2012). Perception of proximity.
Pradono, B. (2019). The interiority of proximity between nature and architecture in contemporary and tropical contexts with case studies.
Rana, J. P. (2021). Quantitative Methods.
Sanders, E. B.-N. (2002). From user-centred to participatory design approaches.
Sevaldson, B. (2018). Beyond user-centric design.
Shahbazi, M. M. (2018). A comparative analysis of spatial configuration in designing residential houses using space syntax method (case studies: houses of Isfahan and modern architecture styles.
Shahedi, B. N. (2010). Classification of Meaning in Architecture.
Sinton, D. S. (2017). Critical spatial thinking.
Skaza, M. (2019). Architecture as a Consequence of Perception.
Soltani, S. e. (2022). The role of spatial configuration in moderating the relationship between social sustainability and urban density.
Suvanajata, R. (2000). Relations in Architectural Space.
Thier, P. T. (2002). The functional architecture of attention.
Tonnelat, S. (2010). The sociology of urban public spaces.
Tversky, B. e. (1999). Three spaces of spatial cognition.
Ugwu, C. ". (2023). Qualitative Research.
Üngür, E. (2015). Space: the undefinable space of architecture.
Usman, M. e. (2018). Interactive spatial analytics for human-aware building design.
Xavier, J. C. (2022). Enhancing Functionality and User Experience through User.
Yan, P.-H. (2014). The Study of Design Semiotics and Architectural Space Semantics.
It is the policy of the Journal of Duhok University to own the copyright of the technical contributions. It publishes and facilitates the appropriate re-utilize of the published materials by others. Photocopying is permitted with credit and referring to the source for individuals use.
Copyright © 2017. All Rights Reserved.



