SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES IN KURDISTAN REGION-IRAQ

  • MAND ASKAR
  • KAMIRAN ABDUKA
  • LAWEND ASKAR
Keywords: Seismic assessment; non-linear static pushover analysis; RC buildings; target displacement; capacity curve.

Abstract

Earthquakes are one of the most destructive natural disasters that cause losses of life, damage to
infrastructure and economic issues. Therefore, seismic risk assessment is essential for disaster mitigation,
disaster management, and emergency preparedness. Seismic vulnerability is one of the major factors for
evaluating the risk of earthquakes on reinforced concrete (RC) buildings. Seismic vulnerable RC buildings
are buildings located in a seismic region and either designed with an outdated design code or designed
without consideration for seismic activity. In the Kurdistan region of Iraq, most of the existing RC
buildings do not meet the typical current seismic standard requirements as the region was expected as
non-seismic region and followed the Iraqi seismic zone which considered as a low seismic region, therefore
these type of buildings is expected to suffer extensive damage during strong earthquakes. Vulnerable RC
buildings should be assessed in order to prevent future damage and new designed buildings need to meet
such codes. Previous studies, conducted assessment of four to six stories structures in order to evaluate
seismicity and to increase ductility of the evaluated structures based on member size. In this research, an
existing 8-storey RC building, located in Duhok governorate- Kurdistan region of Iraq, is redesigned and
evaluated. SeismoStruct V6.5 software was utilized for the purpose of simulating ductility and detailing
for the existing structure using pushover analysis. The ductility of the existing and the proposed
redesigned buildings then evaluated by obtaining inter-story drift and displacement based on capacity
curve. The original design is further evaluated in terms of reinforcement ratio and detailing by
redesigning the existing building in accordance with the ACI code 318, 2014 and using ETABS software
version 9.7 for analysing. Nonlinear static pushover analysis is used for seismic performance evaluation.
Inelastic static analysis procedures include capacity spectrum method and displacement coefficient
method. The structure is then analyzed to observe the yielding of the members and the adequacy of the
structural strength. The extent of damage experienced by the structure at the target displacement
represents the damage that would be experienced by the building when it is subjected to an earthquake.
As a conclusion, the redesigned structure showed 30% increasing in displacement when loaded in x-
direction based on both ultimate and calculated base shear while the increase in displacement was around
10% when loaded in the y-direction. This displacement increase led into improving the ductility in the
redesigned structure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

EL-KHOLY, S., EL-ASSALY, M. & MAHER, M.
2012. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of
Existing Multi-Story Reinforced Concrete
Buildings in Egypt. Arabian Journal for
Science & Engineering (Springer Science &
Business Media B.V. ), 37, 341-355.
Castaldo, P., Palazzo, B., and Ferrentino,
T. (2017) Seismic reliability- based ductility
demand evaluation for inelastic base-isolated
structures with friction pendulum
devices. Earthquake Engng Struct.
Dyn., 46: 1245–1266. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2854.
KRAWINKLER, H. & SENEVIRATNA, G. 1998.
Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of
seismic performance evaluation. Engineering
structures, 20, 452-464.
MWAFY, A. & ELNASHAI, A. 2001. Static
pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of
RC buildings. Engineering structures, 23, 407-
424.
AHMED, S. Y. 2013. Seismic Evaluation of
Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Pushover
Analysis. Al-Rafadain Engineering Journal,
21, 28-45.
MASI, A. & VONA, M. 2012. Vulnerability
assessment of gravity-load designed RC
buildings: Evaluation of seismic capacity
through non-linear dynamic analyses.
Engineering Structures, 45, 257-269.
REPAPIS, C., ZERIS, C. & VINTZILEOU, E. 2006.
EVALUATION OF THE SEISMIC
PERFORMANCE OF EXISTING RC
BUILDINGS II:: A CASE STUDY FOR
REGULAR AND IRREGULAR
BUILDINGS. Journal of Earthquake
Engineering, 10, 429-452.
ATHANASSIADOU, C. 2008. Seismic performance
of R/C plane frames irregular in elevation.
Engineering structures, 30, 1250-1261.
RAJEEV, P. & TESFAMARIAM, S. 2012. Seismic
fragilities for reinforced concrete buildings
with consideration of irregularities. Structural
Safety, 39, 1-13.
CHINTANAPAKDEE, C. & CHOPRA, A. K. 2004b.
Seismic Response of Vertically Irregular
Frames: Response History and Modal
Pushover Analyses. Journal of Structural
Engineering, 130, 1177-1185.
ASCE 41-06 (2007), Seismic Rehabilitation of the
Existing Buildings, American SARKAR S. (2013): Seismic Evaluation of 4-Story
Reinforced Concrete Structure by Non-Linear
Static Pushover Analysis, Bachelor of
Technology Thesis, National Institute of
Technology Rourkela, Department of Civil
Engineering.
LEE, C. S., HAN, S. W. & KWON, H. W. 2013.
Seismic performance evaluation for gravity-
designed flat plate frames. Magazine of
Concrete Research, 65, 1110-1127.
WALKER, S. G. (2001). ‘‘Seismic performance of
existing reinforced concrete beam-column
joints’’, MSCE thesis, Univ. of Washington,
Seattle, 250P.
RAJU, K., CINITHA, A. & IYER, N. 2012. Seismic
performance evaluation of existing RC
buildings designed as per past codes of
practice. Sadhana, 37, 281-297.
MONAVARI B., MASSUMI A., KAZEM, A
(2012): Estimation of Displacement Demand
in RC Frames and Comparing with Target
Displacement Provided by FEMA-356, 15th
World Conference on Earthquake
Engineering, 24th to 28th September, 2012,
Lisbon, Portugal.
MOUZZOUN M., Moustachi O., Taleb A., Jalal S.
(2013): Seismic performance assessment of
reinforced concrete buildings using pushover
analysis, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and
Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE); ISSN: 2278-
1684 Volume 5, Issue 1 (Jan. - Feb. 2013), PP
44-49.
ATC 40,” Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of
Concrete Buildings”, Applied Technology
Council, Redwood City, CA, USA, Report No.
SSC 96-01, Vol. 1 & 2, Nov. 1996.
FEMA 356, Pre-standard and Commentary for the
Seismic Rehabilitation of the Buildings,
Federal Emergency Management Agency &
American Society of Civil Engineers,
November 2000. Centre, 1997.
Published
2020-12-29
How to Cite
ASKAR, M., ABDUKA, K., & ASKAR, L. (2020). SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES IN KURDISTAN REGION-IRAQ. Journal of Duhok University, 23(2), 116-130. Retrieved from https://journal.uod.ac/index.php/uodjournal/article/view/913